BP_blog
Are We 99% Chimps?

Not so Fast, Bonzo



Putting myths to rest is always a good thing, and right now it needs to be bedtime for Bonzo.

Listen Now | Download


John Stonestreet

Journalists and science writers endlessly repeat the biological bromide that “humans and chimpanzees are 99% genetically identical,” a factoid that has taken on a life of its own and, pun intended, has evolved into a worldview assumption. If our genes are virtually indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees, the reasoning goes, we must be virtually indistinguishable from chimpanzees!

Kevin Williamson, writing at the National Review of all places, made this leap about Ivanka Trump’s rude welcome by fellow airline passengers recently. If we are, after all, 99% chimps, it’s not surprising our inner apes would make an appearance, say, on a JetBlue flight.

Now, people certainly are capable of acting like animals, and the scientific-sounding assertion that we really are animals at heart seems to explain it. But there’s just one problem: It’s not true. Our DNA is not 99% identical to that of chimpanzees. Even if it were, that wouldn’t make us apes-except-for-one-percent. That’s bad genetic science and reductionist philosophy, to boot.

Writing at Evolution News and Views, David Klinghoffer points out that the “99%” myth is based on hopelessly outdated research. But it got a shot in the arm after researchers at the Genome Consortium announced in 2005 they’d sequenced chimp DNA and compared it with our own.

daily_commentary_01_24_17Newspapers the world over trumpeted the similarity between the two genomes as further proof of our close ancestry. What they neglected to mention was that the project only compared protein-coding segments of the genome, which in humans, account for just 2% of the total! The rest is what Francis Collins once termed “junk DNA.” Except, as scientists have since discovered and Collins has admitted, this “junk” serves regulatory roles that determine how other genes are expressed, particularly in the brain. In other words, “junk DNA,” which makes up the vast majority of our genome, is a vital part of what makes humans, human and chimps, chimps.

Second, it turns out that the “99%” figure resulted from using a complete human genome as the template to sequence that of chimpanzees. That would be like assembling a jigsaw puzzle based on how another puzzle fit together!

The comparison also selected for areas of greater similarity and discarded those that didn’t match. To put it very simply, the two genomes looked similar because researchers expected them to look similar.

Based on what we now know, biologist and Senior Fellow at the Center for Science and Culture, Ann Gauger, estimates that humans and chimps share around 92% of our DNA. To put that in perspective, scientists tell us that we’re 90% identical to cats.

But then it gets more complicated. As Gauger explained in an interview with the Discovery Institute, recent advances show how differently human and ape bodies put specific genes to work. Special proteins called transcription factors switch certain genes on and off during development, and roughly one to three percent of these are human-specific. Apes don’t have them.”

The differences on the level of gene transcription, splicing, and expression are so profound that Gauger compares the process with an operating system, and protein-specific DNA with lines of code. They may look the same, but the results—a human and a chimp—could hardly be more different.

As former British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli observed indignantly upon reading Darwin, human beings are more like angels than apes. And he was right. No animal speaks, composes symphonies, paints masterpieces, sends probes to Saturn, or more importantly—desires a relationship with God.

Even if the “99%” canard were true, it wouldn’t make us 99% chimps any more than a diamond’s carbon composition makes it 99% coal. We’re not the sum of our genes, and it’s past time that journalists and commentators evolve past this outdated assertion.

(Editor's Note: This article originally stated that the 2005 Nature study only compared 2% of the human genome to chimps. It actually compared the whole thing, but used selective methods that ignored major dissimilarities. We regret the mistake. See Dr. Ann Gauger’s interview with ‘ID:The Future’ for more information on the dissimilarity of chimp and human DNA. (Series is hereherehere, and here.)


Further Reading and Information
Are We 99% Chimps?: Not so Fast, Bonzo

We're 100% the image-bearers of God, and as John said, we desire a relationship with our Creator. That fact alone demonstrates a vital difference between humans and animals. For more revealing details on this subject, click on the links below.

Resources

Fake Science: "About 99% of Our DNA Is Identical to That of Chimpanzees"
David Klinghoffer | evolutionnews.org | January 2, 2017

How Chimps and Humans are Different, Pt. 1: The Genome
Discovery Institute | November 18, 2016

How Chimps and Humans are Different, Pt. 2: Human-specific Genes
Discovery Institute | November 22, 2016


Available at the online bookstore

Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design
Stephen Meyer | HarperOne Publishers | June 2014


Comments:

What 99% DOESN'T mean!
Hi, John. The real figure is I believe 97%. People that would push the 99% are wishful thinkers.

If you want to really know what that percent means though you need to understand how much information we are talking about. While human DNA is 2.9 to 3.2 billion base pairs of nucleic acid molecules, one of the sub-species of Amoeba has 670 billion base pairs.

So you see 3% or even 1% is no small thing! Trying to use that as a threshold for evolution is just mathematically stupid.

The chance possibility that such an amoeba DNA arose by chance arrangement of those nucleic acids turns out to be 4 to the power of 670,000,00,000. That equals one chance in 3.999 X 10 to the power 413,319,918,190 (see that complete number at the bottom of my comment). Even if you said that there were a hundred billion possibly correct combinations it would be like divideing that number below by 100,000,000,000 which you can see would have no increase in the odds of this occurrence by chance.

You can read my full article on this here: http://www.amerechristian.com/the-case-against-evolution/

Warmest regareds,
Ron Smith MD, Pediatrics

39 994 967 421 848 910 515 830 891 485 929 873 539 200 859 478 110 890 046 870 902 973 811 397 920 013 154 264 044 806 966 368 766 890 560 334 898 057 354 957 460 991 513 009 979 218 569 129 129 153 483 557 828 349 006 800 907 063 281 876 506 271 581 554 720 007 349 513 619 281 699 834 915 654 215 605 813 999 586 134 578 638 487 562 271 060 398 541 468 204 808 466 449 370 220 154 689 313 785 035 081 434 537 109 678 931 650 139 920 672 226 961 937 056 370 747 827 436 399 579 577 781 894 369 126 135 235 359 981 612 583 174 092 148 572 812 451 396 985 949 322 349 982 431 102 855 445 850 644 170 231 780 263 633 773 563 838 153 350 354 671 412 015 814 688 687 757 112 841 366 058 246 513 133 149 198 310 558 695 664 549 451 809 175 129 782 380 919 010 406 793 851 191 468 769 106 636 250 539 681 518 630 619 043 314 949 500 544 367 822 279 572 636 349 791 238 595 690 784 888 003 137 361 102 179 098 490 441 663 804 960 541 478 602 696 942 715 681 369 118 620 958 194 379 850 952 001 014 269 432 698 697 003 874 158 995 944 986 700 364 628 432 578 820 520 177 129 985 885 387 365 616 434 349 366 446 933 301 873 657 503 190 681 971 557 734 329 146 263 760 242 892 262 023 603 324 535 364 050 902 887 137 448 125 229 547 998 486 942 139 172 417 409 720 398 399 068 282 603 135 163 …

~ followed by 403,319,987,229 more digits ~




Commentaries